Vince Gilligan talks about creating and running Breaking Bad and writing on the X-Files.
Source: nerdist.com
I want to see Napoleon so bad. The three screen idea is so intriguing.
The film was an astonishment, and it was doomed. One hurdle was its length — his early versions ran from 3 hours to 6 hours 28 minutes (down from 9 hours) — while other difficulties were posed by Gance’s advances, specifically a process later called Polyvision that extended the visual plane into a panorama or three separate images and that required three screens to show it.
— ‘Napoleon’ Is Lost, Long Live ‘Napoleon’!
Source: The New York Times
What kid wouldn’t want an iPod with $8 billion of stolen goods on it?
Rob Reid reveals the overwhelming complexity of ©opyright Math™ used by the film and music industries when projecting how much is lost due to piracy.
I knew the numbers were inflated, but…
David Fincher and his designers discuss the Dragon Tattoo titles and design
It’s got to move the heart, or the mind, or the groin. It’s got to engage you on some other part of your being than just your eyes.
— David Fincher
There were other things that were tangential and totally foreign to the final, but you’ve got to hit all of those dead ends in order to find something different. You’ve got to go down that road and fail – a lot.
…
I generate a lot of failures, but there’s usually a grain of something interesting when you take a chance, and after a while, all those parts and pieces can add up to something interesting.
…
I mean, it’s not that difficult to make a pretty picture. It’s much more difficult to do something that’s a little different while remaining perfectly appropriate and authentic, and that’s what we were after.
…
The closer you can get to something that’s authentic and appropriate – if you have good reasons for your decisions and can speak about your ideas as solutions – the easier it may be for someone to accept something they’ve never seen before.
— Neil Kellerhouse
Charlie Rose talks with with Mexican filmmakers Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Guillermo Del Toro, Alfonso Cuaron. The only way this could have been better is if Emmanuel Lubezki had been there.
Source: charlierose.com
Is Television the New Cinema?
An interesting panel discussion put together by The New Yorker on whether TV is replacing Film.
Source: gointothestory.blcklst.com
How I Made My Films Site
Building my films site was a really exciting and educational experience for me. I gave this presentation about it at a creative team meeting last week.

Title.

I want people to see my stuff.

The Problem: My portfolio site does a decent job of featuring my design work, but my films get lost in it. Alternatively, Vimeo is a good place to find all of my videos, but it’s not exclusive to my work and cannot be customized visually.

The Solution: Make a new site.


I treated the project as a playground. I was the designer and client, so I felt free to try things that I may not typically be able to do (to the extent I’d like at least).

Influences and choices.

The concept for the site came from combining the fullscreen, sectional portfolios with cinematic, animated GIFs. I wanted something that immerses you in one thing at a time and is continually moving, like film.

I went with Futura as my primary font for the site. I love geometric sans-serifs and Futura especially for the slight off-ness of it (especially when italicized). For contrast, I used Georgia in the body copy.

The current navigation style came late in the game. It initially was a horizontal nav that was fixed as you scrolled near the top right of the window, but it would often cover up content and limited the number of links I could include. While exploring other options, I remembered Chance Graham’s site which then reminded me of New Order’s album Power, Corruption, and Lies.

This site took about three weeks from start to finish. Coding and asset preparation were two of those.

There were several code libraries and snippets I took advantage of to speed up development and enhance the site:

FitVids is a great tool for making video embeds responsive, but it has a shortcoming in that it scales only according to width. I needed my videos to scale with height also, so I did some math and worked up a fix in Javascript that resized a video container’s width if the window becomes wider than the video area.
// edit FitVids code - http://j.mp/yIVjuJ
// adjust panels and video to window size
function setPanelSize(){
var windowHeight = $(window).height();
var windowWidth = $(window).width();
var videoWidth;
//calculate whether the video is too tall for the space
if ( ((windowWidth-120)*.5625) > (windowHeight-160) ) {
videoWidth = (windowHeight-160)*1.777;
}
//resize video and panel
$(‘.videocontent’).css({‘max-width’:videoWidth+’px’});
$(‘.panel’).css({‘height’:windowHeight+’px’});
//reset scrollspy
$(‘body’).scrollSpy(‘refresh’);
}

Unexpectedly, the navigation was the biggest hurdle in the coding. It’s kind of complicated to explain why but the problem lies with my wanting to keep the width of the hover states determined by the text length. If you make each the same fixed width, it’s simple, but it doesn’t look as nice. I came up with two solutions and the one I went with, simply changing text size from 0 to 18 on hover, had an unintentionally cool effect.
#main-nav li {
height: 40px;
}
#main-nav a {
background-color: #ccc;
line-height: 40px;
display: inline-block;
height: 40px;
position: relative;
border: none;
color: #fff;
font-size: 0;
padding-left: 40px;
overflow: hidden;
-webkit-transition: all 0.2s ease;
-moz-transition: all 0.2s ease;
-o-transition: all 0.2s ease;
transition: all 0.2s ease;
}
#main-nav a:hover {
font-size: 18px;
padding-right: 20px;
}

There are a ton of ways to create animated GIFs. This was my general workflow for creating the looped animations from video footage.

When it came time to launch my site, I obviously turned to Facebook and Twitter, but I also submitted it to a handful of web design galleries.

As a result, I received a couple of awards.

I’m only sharing this because I found it interesting to look at how the hits rise and fall with the web gallery mentions.

I was getting the most hits I’d ever had, but when I dug deeper in the stats, I was a little let down.

Overall, I feel like the site has been a success. Lots of people are seeing my stuff, I’m gaining more followers, and I’m making some meaningful contacts.

But I believe I’m still missing my audience.

Back to work.
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
— Linus Pauling, an American chemist, biochemist, peace activist, author, and educator. He was one of the most influential chemists in history and ranks among the most important scientists of the 20th century. Pauling was among the first scientists to work in the fields of quantum chemistry and molecular biology.
Source: visualphotos.com
“Why’s this so good?” No. 32: Darcy Frey on the brink
Laurie Hertzel analyzes the pace and language of good suspenseful writing.
He keeps this tension going by sprinkling the narrative with reminders of how terrible things are. He doesn’t clump it all together in one blob, but every few paragraphs, every few scenes, he rolls out another reminder that everything could fall apart in an instant.

